+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: The Flaw in the concept of Original Sin

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lusaka
    Posts
    189
    Rep Power
    32

    Default The Flaw in the concept of Original Sin

    Another one of my musings from another chapter in my book. Please add comments. I welcome them all. Perhaps one of them will help me see the light for I am greatly in the dark and need my eyes opened:

    First things first, I firmly believe that it was neither Adam nor Eve’s fault that sin entered this world. Consider this: Adam and Eve’s sin was that they disobeyed God and ate of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Now that is very interesting. Admittedly, God warned them about the tree (Gen 2:15-17).

    The interesting thing about all this is that only after eating of the fruit did they become aware that they had done something wrong (Gen 3:6-7).

    Now unless my linguistic skills are out of sorts, this suggests that before the act of disobedience, the very concept of disobedience did not exist. Before that incident they were completely ignorant. Put in that context, one begins to realize that the whole affair is rather unfair.
    I have a few questions that have always nagged me, and perhaps a few other people. If the tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil was purely the preserve of God, then why did he specifically put it in the Garden of Eden, which was made for man?

    Ah, but the garden was not meant for Adam and Eve, was it? They were simply there to look after it on behalf of God, right? But then, What use was a physically edible tree to a spiritual Being like God?If God simply intended man to look after the garden, it follows that he would have put measures in place to prevent them from getting to it. This business of simply relying on obedience is rather fishy. How easy was it for them to obey when they had no knowledge of the difference between good and evil, right and wrong? This raises the question of responsibility. Who was ultimately responsible for the sinful act?
    If, on the other hand, the garden was specifically made for man, then that tree had no business being there, unless it was meant to be a test; a Crucible of some kind. If it was a test, I think it was unfair. I mean how fair is it to have a test on a subject you know nothing about? A subject that has never been taught?
    ''An inspired Mind is the gem of genius.'' Oscar Mubila

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    lusaka
    Posts
    72
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deosstheguru View Post
    Another one of my musings from another chapter in my book. Please add comments. I welcome them all. Perhaps one of them will help me see the light for I am greatly in the dark and need my eyes opened:

    First things first, I firmly believe that it was neither Adam nor Eve’s fault that sin entered this world. Consider this: Adam and Eve’s sin was that they disobeyed God and ate of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Now that is very interesting. Admittedly, God warned them about the tree (Gen 2:15-17).

    The interesting thing about all this is that only after eating of the fruit did they become aware that they had done something wrong (Gen 3:6-7).

    Now unless my linguistic skills are out of sorts, this suggests that before the act of disobedience, the very concept of disobedience did not exist. Before that incident they were completely ignorant. Put in that context, one begins to realize that the whole affair is rather unfair.
    I have a few questions that have always nagged me, and perhaps a few other people. If the tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil was purely the preserve of God, then why did he specifically put it in the Garden of Eden, which was made for man?

    Ah, but the garden was not meant for Adam and Eve, was it? They were simply there to look after it on behalf of God, right? But then, What use was a physically edible tree to a spiritual Being like God?If God simply intended man to look after the garden, it follows that he would have put measures in place to prevent them from getting to it. This business of simply relying on obedience is rather fishy. How easy was it for them to obey when they had no knowledge of the difference between good and evil, right and wrong? This raises the question of responsibility. Who was ultimately responsible for the sinful act?
    If, on the other hand, the garden was specifically made for man, then that tree had no business being there, unless it was meant to be a test; a Crucible of some kind. If it was a test, I think it was unfair. I mean how fair is it to have a test on a subject you know nothing about? A subject that has never been taught?
    the bible says obedience is better than sacrifice!!the garden was for man to take care of..let me ask you if you have a farm i guess u have every right to plant whatever you want,your keepers or workers cannot tel you what to plant and what not to plant and moreover they cannot eat what you have not told them to eat(gen ch2vs17) and God been the farm manager did that xactly,the serpent(devil)knew(ch3vs1) what good was in that tree and he worked his way around the woman been the weaker vessel
    the snake was responsible as well as man who gave in..that is why god cursed the snake and man too!
    i hope it makes some sense!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lusaka
    Posts
    177
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Yes...But Adam and Eve had no Bible...or should i say No Torah...!

    Wriiten anyway....

    Gelo..Thanks for your opinion, but wouldn't it be fair to say the farm workers have some knowledge of whether to still from the farm or not...?
    I go where i want to go....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    lusaka
    Posts
    72
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Logan View Post
    Yes...But Adam and Eve had no Bible...or should i say No Torah...!

    Wriiten anyway....

    Gelo..Thanks for your opinion, but wouldn't it be fair to say the farm workers have some knowledge of whether to still from the farm or not...?
    true logan they had no bible because they spoke directly with God,and they had no knowledge of good and evil because they were sinless
    the farm workers ofcourse have knowledge of good and evil and can steal but i used that example just to illustrate that they cannot dictate to you what to plant and what not to plant and what you have forbidden them they shouldn't touch..
    ignorance is not an excuse!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    London/manchester/lusaka/Kuala lumpur/doha
    Posts
    331
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    The devil and grigori were the first to disobey before Adam was even created. I don't know if the garden of eden was the preserve of YHWH because the devil seemed to have free reign over the place. With regards to being unfair Adam and eve were given a choice and warning.
    To one that does not know a garden is a forest

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lusaka
    Posts
    177
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    Yo Taikun...

    Who is/was Grigori..?

    I don't think i have come across that name.
    I go where i want to go....

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    London/manchester/lusaka/Kuala lumpur/doha
    Posts
    331
    Rep Power
    45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Logan View Post
    Yo Taikun...

    Who is/was Grigori..?

    I don't think i have come across that name.
    They are called demons today , they used to be good angels that switched and turned bad
    To one that does not know a garden is a forest

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Manchester, England
    Posts
    244
    Rep Power
    34

    Talking

    CHOICE. I don't think the tree was there as a test but it was there to give man a choice. Could be that God wanted to let the man know that he had a choice between obeying God or doing what he wanted to do...just as the Devil was not destroyed after he sinned, he was given a choice; decided to challenge Gods sovereignity and God let him try to mount his challenge (e.g the case of Job with the Devil saying man only obeyed when offered Gods blessing)...just why man would think of anything other than obeying God IF the devil had not sinned, I DON'T KNOW.

    Question...Did the devil decide to challenge God after man was created or before?
    Turn on that Mypod n lets log on to Ispace!

    Xbox Live Gamertag: Kibeazy

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lusaka
    Posts
    177
    Rep Power
    29

    Default

    After...

    Especially after he saw Eve...
    Last edited by Logan; May 15, 2009 at 06:23 PM.
    I go where i want to go....

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    lusaka
    Posts
    72
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Logan View Post
    After...

    Especially after he saw Eve...
    hahahahahaahaaa...imwe its you who say the the bible was censored the snake actually had sex with eve!lol
    ignorance is not an excuse!!

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 13, 2008, 04:07 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 13, 2008, 10:28 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 12, 2008, 01:45 PM
  4. The original Black hebrews documentary
    By wathafuc in forum General Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: August 1, 2007, 06:08 PM
  5. be original
    By chanda in forum General Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: April 10, 2007, 12:27 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts